If you want to avoid the letterbox, then you need to apply a different approach so that your full vertical field of view is visible in 858 lines of resolution rather than 812 lines as above. Here’s a simpler approach that should work.ĭCI 4K Widescreen 2048x858 (with letterbox) or 2048x812 without border Advanced Settings: In Resolve, my timeline would usually be set to the resolution of my deliverables. You can select whatever aspect ratio in camera that you prefer. one cannot change the aspect ratio independently in camera with that setting?. When using the (1.33) anamorphic lenses I set my bmpcc4k to 4096 x 2160. I'm still processing (in my head) your post and will give that a go if I understand it correctly. one cannot change the aspect ratio independently in camera with that setting? Have I understood this correctly? bit confused here.Īlso thanks to RikshaDriver. ' - When using the (1.33) anamorphic lenses I set my bmpcc4k to 4096 x 2160. 'When shooting with the 1.33x anamorphic lenses, your camera capture aspect ratio should be UHD 16:9. When you say 'select a downscaling option' I presume you mean in the 'ImagingScaling' properties? i.e - 'full frame with crop'. You can get there quickly in Resolve by defining your timeline or deliverables as 2048x858 and using a downscaling option that will not distort your image. So that and the spherical lens 2.4:1 image size both need to be cropped to DCI widescreen which is commonly written as aspect ratio 2.39:1. The resulting image when desqueezed in post will be about 2.364:1. Rick.lang wrote:When shooting with the 1.33x anamorphic lenses, your camera capture aspect ratio should be UHD 16:9. ![]() Side note: my timeline/project resolution setting is the same as my deliverable. e.g keep the total resolution both vertically and horizontally for both types of lenses but fit into the same frame size (so that the borders top and bottom don’t change when cutting between the shots). ![]() but wondering if there were a better way. I must say it does look good with very slight cropping of the anamorphic image off the sides (I guess to be expected). What I did to get around this (so both spherical and anamorphic material matched frame size I.e the boarders top and bottom were the same), is I set the Mismatched Resolution files (image scaling) setting to ‘Scale full frame with crop’. I know the anamorphic is obviously a wider image but again, didn’t expect to see such a difference. I do indeed shoot 4K 2.4:1 with spherical lenses but when I mixed this with the 4K DCI 1.33 Anamorphic, the frame size was very different - thin boarders top and bottom (unlike the spherical lens image setting) which I didn’t expect because I thought these lenses produced the same 2.4:1 image dimension. ![]() 2.8K at a minimum will give you better colour than 2.6K for 2K DCI Widescreen, 2048x858. I don’t recommend shooting 2.6K unless your deliverables are 1920x1080 or the widescreen equivalent and that will give you good colour for HD Widescreen 1920x804. ![]() Or you can shoot 4K 2.4:1 to maximize your capture resolution and then downscale in post for improved detail and colour. Rick.lang wrote:With the spherical lenses you can shoot 2.8K and then crop in post to 2.39:1.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |